Note: This article provides a focused explanation and extended discussion on a specific standard. If you’d like to see the full list of articles and short summaries for this standard, please visit the “Series Overview” page.
Since 2025, most standard‑related articles on this site have been available in both Chinese and English versions. If you’d like to read the Chinese explanation, please visit the 「系列總覽」 page and look for the corresponding article.
Plain‑English explainer of HKAS 8 / IAS 8 for students, junior accountants and non‑specialists who find official standards too dense to read.
This article is based on Hong Kong Accounting Standards (HKAS / HKFRS), which are fully aligned with IAS / IFRS except for minor local tweaks, so the same principles generally apply under IAS / IFRS unless noted otherwise. The goal is to unpack HKAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors (equivalent to IAS 8) using plain English and practical, real‑life examples instead of technical jargon. It is written for students, junior accountants, audit juniors and finance professionals who want to understand not just “what the standard says” but how to actually read and prepare financial statements in line with it.
When you see “the company” or “the entity” below, you can think of any entity that prepares general purpose financial statements under HKFRS / IFRS.
Why Estimates Cause So Much Confusion at Year-End
If you have ever worked through a year-end close or reviewed a set of working papers, you have probably encountered moments like this: management updates the expected credit loss (ECL) estimate in the final weeks before the reporting deadline; a valuation report on investment properties shows a much larger swing than in prior years; or a warranty provision jumps significantly and nobody can give a clear answer as to why.
The underlying question in all of these situations is the same: is this a normal estimate update, or does it mean something was wrong last year? Does it need to be restated retrospectively, or can it simply flow through the current period? And what exactly needs to go in the notes?
If you cannot clearly distinguish a change in accounting estimate from an error or a policy change, you risk getting the journal entries wrong, preparing the wrong disclosures, and — in an audit context — misclassifying an adjustment in your working papers. HKAS 8’s framework for accounting estimates gives you a principled way to work through all of these questions.
What You Should Be Able To Do After Reading?
By the end, you should be able to:
- Explain what accounting estimates and measurement uncertainty are, and understand how estimates relate to — but are distinct from — accounting policies.
- Recognise the most common estimate-heavy items in practice, including ECL provisions, depreciation, net realisable value, fair value measurements, and warranty provisions.
- Distinguish a change in accounting estimate from a policy change or an error, using a clear and practical decision rule.
- Apply the prospective application requirement: understand which period or periods an estimate change affects, and how to reflect that correctly.
- Know what the notes need to say — including how to handle situations where the future impact of an estimate change simply cannot be quantified with reasonable confidence.
1. What Is a “Accounting Estimate”? And Where Does Measurement Uncertainty Come In?
HKAS 8 defines an accounting estimate as a monetary amount in the financial statements that is subject to measurement uncertainty. In other words: if a number cannot be directly observed and must instead be derived through models, assumptions or judgement, it is an accounting estimate.
The relationship between accounting policies and accounting estimates is straightforward once you see it clearly:
- An accounting policy determines what measurement basis to use — for example, cost, fair value, or net realisable value.
- An accounting estimate is the process of quantifying that measurement when a direct observation is not possible — applying models, inputs and assumptions to arrive at a specific monetary figure.
Think of it this way: the policy sets the target, and the estimate is how you hit it. If the policy says “measure at fair value,” the estimate determines what that fair value actually is — using valuation techniques, comparable transactions, discount rates and other assumptions.
Measurement uncertainty reflects the reality that even when the policy is fixed and unchanged, the estimates derived under it will naturally shift as market conditions change, contracts evolve, or new information becomes available. These shifts are not errors. They are an inherent feature of how accounting works under conditions of uncertainty.
2. Where Estimates Show Up in Practice — A Tour of the Most Common Items
Many numbers in a set of financial statements that look straightforward are actually estimate-driven. Here are the most common ones you will encounter.
Expected Credit Losses (HKFRS 9)
Under HKFRS 9 Financial Instruments (equivalent to IFRS 9), the impairment model requires entities to estimate expected credit losses (ECL) from the moment a financial asset is first recognised. Depending on whether credit risk has increased significantly, the estimate covers either 12-month ECL or lifetime ECL.
The inputs involved — historical default rates, forward-looking economic scenarios (such as GDP forecasts and unemployment projections), and the segmentation of debtors by risk profile — are all assumptions. When any of these inputs change, the ECL figure changes. That is not a mistake; it is the model working as intended.
Net Realisable Value of Inventories (HKAS 2)
Under HKAS 2 Inventories (equivalent to IAS 2), inventories must be written down to net realisable value (NRV) when NRV falls below cost. The NRV assessment involves estimates of future selling prices, expected selling costs, and any further costs needed to complete the goods. When market conditions weaken, products become obsolete, or cost structures shift, the company needs to reassess these estimates — and the write-down amount may change accordingly.
Fair Value Measurements (HKFRS 13)
HKFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (equivalent to IFRS 13) makes clear that when fair value cannot be determined from a Level 1 quoted price in an active market, the company must use valuation techniques with observable or unobservable inputs. For example, estimating the fair value of an investment property using a discounted cash flow approach requires assumptions about occupancy rates, rental growth, and the discount rate. Estimating the fair value of an unlisted equity investment requires projected earnings and an appropriate earnings multiple or discount rate.
Crucially, HKFRS 13 explicitly states that a change in valuation technique — or in how a technique is applied — is generally treated as a change in accounting estimate, not a change in accounting policy. This is an important point that comes up often in practice.
Depreciation and Amortisation (HKAS 16 / HKAS 38)
Under HKAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment (equivalent to IAS 16) and HKAS 38 Intangible Assets (equivalent to IAS 38), calculating depreciation and amortisation requires estimates of useful life, residual value, and — in some cases — the pattern in which the asset’s economic benefits are consumed. If the expected useful life of an asset is reassessed due to technological changes, a shift in usage patterns, or physical wear and tear that differs from original expectations, revising the useful life is a change in accounting estimate.
Warranty and Other Provisions (HKAS 37)
Under HKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (equivalent to IAS 37), warranty provisions, legal claims and similar liabilities must be measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation. These estimates rely on historical claims data, current information, and management’s judgement. Because they are inherently uncertain and dependent on future outcomes, they sit squarely within the domain of accounting estimates.
3. What Counts as a “Change in Accounting Estimate”?
HKAS 8 identifies the following circumstances as generally giving rise to a change in accounting estimate:
- New information becomes available that was not previously known;
- New developments make the original assumptions no longer appropriate;
- The company accumulates more experience over time and can make more informed judgements;
- The inputs used in a measurement model are updated; or
- The valuation technique itself is changed (provided the underlying measurement basis — such as fair value — has not changed).
All of these reflect an updated view of current conditions. They are not corrections of past mistakes, and they do not involve switching to a different accounting principle. That is why they do not require any retrospective adjustment.
When inputs change: two practical examples
ECL model inputs. If actual default rates over time diverge from the original assumptions used in the ECL model, the company updates the default rate parameters and revises its forward-looking economic scenarios accordingly. This is a change in inputs under an unchanged policy — a classic estimate change.
Depreciation period reassessment. A company finds that a production line is wearing out faster than originally expected. It shortens the remaining useful life from ten years to six. The depreciation method has not changed; only the assumption about how long the asset will remain in service. This is an estimate change, applied prospectively from the current period.
When the valuation technique changes: still an estimate, not a policy
HKFRS 13 is explicit on this point: changing the valuation technique used to estimate fair value — or refining how an existing technique is applied — is generally treated as a change in accounting estimate, not a change in accounting policy.
To illustrate: suppose a company that holds investment properties has historically used the income approach (discounting projected future cash flows to derive a present value) but switches to the market approach (benchmarking against prices observed in comparable market transactions) because comparable data has become more readily available. The measurement basis — fair value — has not changed. What changed is the technique used to arrive at that fair value. This is an estimate change.
By contrast, if the company switched from measuring investment properties at fair value to measuring them at cost, that would be a change in measurement basis — and potentially a change in accounting policy.
The boundary rule: when in doubt, treat it as an estimate change
HKAS 8 itself provides a practical tie-breaker: if it is not clear whether a change is a policy change or an estimate change, treat it as an estimate change. As a working rule:
- If the measurement basis has changed (e.g., cost to fair value): likely a policy change.
- If the inputs or techniques within the same measurement basis have changed: generally an estimate change.
4. Prospective Application — How Estimate Changes Flow Through the Financial Statements
Unlike accounting policy changes, which generally require retrospective restatement of prior periods, estimate changes are always applied prospectively. There is no going back to adjust prior periods. The change takes effect from the period in which the new estimate is adopted, and flows forward from there.
When the change only affects the current period
If an estimate change has no effect beyond the current reporting period, the entire impact is recognised in the current period’s profit or loss. For example: a warranty provision that relates only to products already sold is reassessed upward. Because the revised estimate does not affect future sales, the full adjustment is recognised in the current year’s income statement.
When the change affects both the current and future periods
If the change in estimate has implications for future periods as well, the impact is split accordingly: the current period effect is recognised in the current period, and the future period effects are reflected as those periods are reported. Prior periods are never adjusted.
Example — shortened depreciation period. A company revises the remaining useful life of an asset from eight years to four. The annual depreciation charge increases from the current period onwards. The prior years’ depreciation is not restated; the change applies from the date of revision, flowing through both the current year and the remaining three years of the asset’s revised life.
When the change affects the carrying amount of an asset or liability
HKAS 8 also makes clear that if an estimate change results in an adjustment to the carrying amount of an asset or liability — rather than flowing directly through profit or loss — the adjustment is made to the carrying amount directly. For instance, updating the ECL estimate adjusts the allowance account and the net carrying amount of the financial asset. Revising the assumptions used in a fair value measurement adjusts the carrying amount of the asset or liability on the balance sheet.
5. Disclosure — What Goes in the Notes, and What to Do When You Can’t Quantify the Future Impact
When an estimate change has a material effect on the financial statements, HKAS 8 requires disclosure of:
- The nature of the change in estimate;
- The amount of the effect on the current period; and
- Where it is possible to make a reasonable estimate, the expected effect on future periods.
When future impacts can be reasonably estimated
If the future impact is reasonably determinable — for example, a shortened depreciation period with a known asset carrying amount — the company can calculate the effect on depreciation expense for each of the remaining years and disclose those figures. This helps readers understand the trajectory of future earnings as a result of the estimate revision.
When future impacts cannot be reasonably estimated
Sometimes the future impact is genuinely too uncertain to quantify with confidence. Think of a large litigation provision where the outcome depends on court proceedings, or an ECL adjustment made against the backdrop of extreme macroeconomic volatility. In these cases, HKAS 8 permits the company to disclose simply:
- The nature of the estimate change;
- The impact already recognised in the current period (where determinable); and
- A clear statement that the financial effect on future periods cannot be reasonably estimated at this stage.
This approach is more honest than presenting a precise-looking figure that is actually not reliable. It also better reflects the spirit of the Conceptual Framework’s requirement for faithful representation.
6. Worked Examples — Putting It All Together
Case 1: Investment property valuation — switching from the income approach to the market approach
A company holds a portfolio of investment properties, all measured at fair value. It has historically used the income approach (discounted cash flow). In the current year, because comparable market transactions have become more readily available and provide better benchmarks, management and the valuer decide to adopt the market approach instead. The measurement basis — fair value under HKFRS 13 — has not changed.
Under HKFRS 13, this is a change in accounting estimate. It is applied prospectively: the investment properties are remeasured at year-end using the market approach, with any resulting gain or loss recognised in the current period’s profit or loss (or other comprehensive income, depending on the accounting policy). There is no restatement of prior period figures.
Case 2: Share appreciation rights — updating the volatility assumption
A company has granted share appreciation rights (SARs) to its employees. The fair value of the SARs is measured at each reporting date using an option pricing model, with the expense spread over the vesting period. One key input in the model is the expected volatility of the company’s share price.
Based on updated market data, the company revises its volatility assumption from 25% to 35%. The measurement basis — fair value using an option pricing model — has not changed. Only the input has been updated to reflect current market conditions. This is a change in accounting estimate, not an error and not a policy change. The revised fair value flows through the current and future periods’ share-based payment expense on a prospective basis.
7. Closing Thoughts: Understanding the Logic Matters More Than Memorising Numbers
When you encounter management saying “we’ve revised our ECL upward,” “we’ve shortened the depreciation period,” or “we’ve updated our valuation methodology,” the right instinct is to work through a short mental checklist:
- What measurement basis does the accounting policy require for this item?
- Has the measurement basis itself changed, or is it only the inputs or techniques used within that basis?
- Is this a legitimate estimate update based on new information, or is it actually correcting something that was wrong before?
- Does the impact fall entirely in the current period, or does it extend into future periods — and what does the disclosure need to say?
HKAS 8’s framework for accounting estimates is not about memorising definitions. It is a structured way of thinking through uncertainty. The clearer you are on the distinction between policies, estimates and errors, the more confidently you can explain — in working papers, audit discussions, or notes to the financial statements — why a number changed, and why that change is being handled the way it is.
Key Takeaways for Students and Junior Accountants
- Policy sets the target; the estimate measures it. Every time you see a number that depends on assumptions or models, ask yourself: what accounting policy determined the measurement basis, and what estimates were made to arrive at the specific figure? That two-step analysis will sharpen how you read financial statements and prepare working papers.
- The policy-vs-estimate boundary is a favourite exam topic. A change in measurement basis (e.g., cost to fair value) is likely a policy change; a change in inputs or valuation technique within the same basis is generally an estimate change. Practice applying this rule to scenarios involving depreciation, ECL, fair value and provisions — these come up repeatedly.
- Prospective, not retrospective. Estimate changes never require restatement of prior periods. When you are preparing an adjusting entry for a revised depreciation period or an updated ECL provision, make sure you are not inadvertently restating comparative figures that should be left unchanged.
- When reviewing working papers, check that any change in a key estimate
If this article was helpful, you’re very welcome to subscribe to my Substack for free:
- All full articles are published on my website first.
- Whenever I finish a mini‑series on a standard, I’ll send one email that pulls the whole series together and links everything in one place, so you can revise without hunting around.
- I occasionally share small, practical tips from real‑life accounting work.
- When I release new PDF notes, in‑depth case studies or paid content in the future, email subscribers will be the first to know.
If you’d like to ask me questions or chat about your learning, you can follow me on Threads / IG and send me a DM — I’ll reply as far as I can.
And if you feel these resources have helped you, you can also buy me a coffee to support me in writing more.
罔相心室: https://chinese.iamdelusionman.com/
Zero-to-Acct Substack: https://zerotoacct.substack.com/
Thread: https://www.threads.com/@yickki_mong
IG: https://www.instagram.com/yickki_mong/
