Note: This article provides a focused explanation and extended discussion on a specific standard. If you’d like to see the full list of articles and short summaries for this standard, please visit the “Series Overview” page.
Since 2025, most standard‑related articles on this site have been available in both Chinese and English versions. If you’d like to read the Chinese explanation, please visit the 「系列總覽」 page and look for the corresponding article.
Plain‑English explainer of HKAS 20 / IAS 20 for students, junior accountants and non‑specialists who find official standards too dense to read.
This article is based on Hong Kong Accounting Standards (HKAS / HKFRS), which are fully aligned with IAS / IFRS except for minor local tweaks, so the same principles generally apply under IAS / IFRS unless noted otherwise. The goal is to unpack HKAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance (equivalent to IAS 20) using plain English and practical, real‑life examples instead of technical jargon. It is written for students, junior accountants, audit juniors and finance professionals who want to understand not just “what the standard says” but how to actually read and prepare financial statements in line with it.
When you see “the company” or “the entity” below, you can think of any entity that prepares general purpose financial statements under HKFRS / IFRS.
Why “After the Grant” Matters: When Support Gets Pulled Back
Imagine this scenario: a few years ago, the entity applied for a government employment subsidy, on the condition that headcount would stay above a certain level for two years. Everyone was optimistic at the time, so the grant was recognised smoothly over two years as income. A few years later, the government performs a review, finds that the headcount dropped below the threshold at some point, and demands repayment of part of the subsidy.
Suddenly, the accounting and audit teams must answer uncomfortable questions:
- Is this a current‑year error, or a change in estimate?
- The grant income was already recognised in prior years—how do we “rewind” the accounting?
- Do the financial statements need to disclose the risk of non‑compliance with conditions or possible claw‑backs?
These are exactly the issues this article addresses. A government grant is not “done and dusted” once recognised. Later repayments and changes in conditions can have real effects on profit or loss, the statement of financial position and the notes. HKAS 20 (equivalent to IAS 20) and HKAS 8 (equivalent to IAS 8) provide the framework to deal with these events in a consistent way.
What You Should Be Able To Do After Reading?
By the end, you should be able to:
- Explain why grant repayments are usually treated as changes in accounting estimates, not corrections of errors, under HKAS 8 / IAS 8.
- Handle the journal‑entry logic when income‑related grants are repaid or when conditions change.
- Understand how the repayment of asset‑related grants affects the carrying amount of assets, depreciation and potential impairment testing.
- Build a disclosure framework that follows the spirit of HKAS 20 / IAS 20 and HKAS 8 / IAS 8 for both grants and wider government assistance.
- Avoid common pitfalls such as wrongly treating repayments as prior‑period errors or ignoring unfulfilled conditions in the notes.
1. Treating Grant Repayments as Changes in Accounting Estimates (HKAS 8 Link)
When an entity first recognises a government grant, it does so on the assumption that there is reasonable assurance that: (1) it will comply with the conditions, and (2) it will receive the grant. This judgement is, in substance, an accounting estimate about the future.
If circumstances later change—for example:
- The government interprets the conditions more strictly than originally understood.
- Business performance is weaker than expected, and some performance targets are not met.
- Policy changes tighten eligibility or review criteria.
Then an amount previously recognised as grant income may need to be partially or fully repaid. Under HKAS 8 / IAS 8, such situations are normally treated as changes in accounting estimates, not as errors. An error would mean that information available at the time was clearly ignored or misused. By contrast, grant conditions are inherently uncertain, and subsequent developments are usually viewed as re‑estimations, not past mistakes.
HKAS 8 / IAS 8 states that changes in estimates affect the current and future periods only, and are not applied retrospectively to restate comparative figures. This is why grant repayments are generally recognised in the period they arise, with suitable explanations in the notes, rather than rewriting prior‑year financial statements.
2. Income‑Related Grants – How to Handle Repayments in Practice
Income‑related grants—such as wage subsidies and rental support—are among the most common and are also the ones most frequently subject to claw‑backs. HKAS 20 / IAS 20 says that when such grants are repaid, the entity should first reverse any unamortised deferred credit, and any excess repayment should be recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Scenario 1: There is still deferred income on the statement of financial position
Assume the entity originally received HKD 2 million of payroll subsidy and planned to recognise it over two years. In Year 1, HKD 1 million was recognised as income, and HKD 1 million remains as deferred income. In Year 2, the government reviews the scheme, finds non‑compliance with headcount conditions, and demands repayment of HKD 1.2 million.
The logic is:
- First, eliminate the remaining HKD 1 million deferred income.
- The extra HKD 0.2 million is recognised as a current‑period expense (for example, “grant repayment loss” or “other expense”) in profit or loss.
Illustrative entry:
- Dr Deferred income – government grant 1,000,000
- Dr Grant repayment loss (or similar expense line) 200,000
- Cr Bank / Payable to government 1,200,000
Past income recognised in Year 1 is not restated; instead, the Year‑2 expense reflects the revised estimate of how much of the grant the entity ultimately retained.
Scenario 2: No deferred income remains
If the grant was originally recognised in full as income—such as a grant that was treated as compensation for past losses—and there is no deferred income on the statement of financial position, then any subsequent repayment is recognised entirely as an expense in the period of repayment.
This happens frequently with one‑off COVID subsidies treated as immediate compensation. Years later, if part of the subsidy is clawed back, the entity does not rewrite the earlier profit; instead, it recognises a new expense in the current period and explains the background in the notes.
3. Asset‑Related Grants – Repayments, Carrying Amounts and Impairment
When a grant is asset‑related—used, for example, to acquire machinery or construct a building—any repayment has implications beyond profit or loss. It affects the carrying amount of the asset and future depreciation, and may even trigger an impairment review. HKAS 20 / IAS 20 provides distinct guidance depending on whether the entity used the deferred income method or the deduction from asset method.
Repayments under the deferred income method
Suppose the entity receives HKD 3 million of grant funding to buy equipment and chooses the deferred income method. The grant is recognised as deferred income and amortised over five years at HKD 0.6 million per year. After three years, a review finds that some conditions were not met, and the government demands repayment of HKD 1.5 million. The statement of financial position still shows deferred income of HKD 1.2 million.
The steps are:
- First, reverse the remaining deferred income of HKD 1.2 million.
- The excess HKD 0.3 million is recognised as an expense in the current period.
This follows the same “use up the deferred credit first, then expense the balance” logic as for income‑related grants, and again avoids restating previously recognised grant income.
Repayments under the deduction from asset method
If the original grant was netted against the asset’s cost—for example, machinery cost reduced from HKD 10 million to HKD 7 million—then a repayment requires the entity to increase the asset’s carrying amount. In practice, the entry to repay part of the grant will look roughly like:
- Dr Property, plant and equipment (increase cost)
- Cr Bank / Payable to government
Once the cost is increased, management must reassess:
- Whether future depreciation should be adjusted to reflect the higher cost and remaining useful life.
- Whether the asset’s recoverable amount has now fallen below its updated carrying amount, in which case an impairment test under HKAS 36 / IAS 36 Impairment of Assets may be required.
In reality, this is often overlooked. Some teams only book the cash repayment and leave the asset figures unchanged, which understates the asset’s cost and can hide potential impairment issues. A complete treatment under HKAS 20 / IAS 20 and HKAS 36 / IAS 36 calls for a full review of both depreciation and recoverable amount after the grant is partially reversed.
4. Disclosure Requirements – Telling the Full Story of Grants and Assistance
HKAS 20 / IAS 20 is not only about recognition and measurement; it places significant emphasis on disclosure. Users of financial statements need to understand how much of the entity’s performance depends on government support, which conditions still apply, and what risks arise from non‑compliance or claw‑backs.
Key disclosure elements typically include:
- Accounting policies
- How the entity distinguishes between asset‑related and income‑related grants.
- Whether it uses the deferred income method or the deduction from asset method for asset‑related grants.
- Nature and extent of grants
- Description of major grant programmes, such as R&D funding, employment subsidies or rental concessions, including their purpose and main conditions.
- Amounts and impact on profit or loss and financial position
- The amount of grant income recognised in the current period.
- The closing balance of deferred income (unrecognised grant) in the statement of financial position.
- Unfulfilled conditions and contingencies
- Any significant unfulfilled performance conditions and the potential amounts that could be repayable.
- Any significant uncertainty about future compliance or future grants, often considered together with HKAS 37 / IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
- Other government assistance
- For non‑grant assistance—such as policy‑based guarantees, free training or advisory services—that significantly affects the entity’s operations, a qualitative description of the nature and expected effects.
HKAS 1 / IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements also encourages disclosure of major judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty. In the context of grants, this includes how management assessed “reasonable assurance”, how they evaluated repayment risk, and why they concluded that no prior‑period error exists when repayments arise.
5. A Combined Case from Initial Grant to Repayment and Disclosure
To connect all these ideas, imagine the following flow:
- Year 1:
- The entity receives HKD 5 million of government support.
- HKD 3 million is tied to buying equipment (asset‑related) and is treated under the deferred income method over a 5‑year useful life.
- HKD 2 million is a wage subsidy (income‑related) and is recognised fully in Year 1 to match current payroll costs.
- Years 2–3:
- The equipment is used as planned. Deferred income is amortised each year and disclosed in the notes.
- The entity continues to meet the wage subsidy conditions, and there are no issues.
- Year 4:
- A government review finds that, in earlier periods, some subsidy was applied to ineligible expenses.
- The government demands repayment of HKD 0.8 million, made up of HKD 0.5 million from the asset‑related component (still unamortised) and HKD 0.3 million from the wage subsidy that had been fully recognised earlier.
The likely accounting treatment is:
- For the asset‑related component:
- Dr Deferred income – government grant 500,000
- Cr Bank / Payable to government 500,000
- For the income‑related component:
- Dr Grant repayment loss / other expense 300,000
- Cr Bank / Payable to government 300,000
The notes would:
- Explain the main conditions of the grant scheme.
- Describe the reasons for the repayment and its effect on current‑year profit or loss.
- Disclose any remaining unfulfilled conditions and major uncertainties about future compliance or further reviews.
To users, the financial statements now show that the repayment is not a random expense but part of the “life cycle” of a grant where conditions evolved over time.
Key Takeaways for Students and Junior Accountants
- When you see a grant repayment or condition change, first ask: “Is this a change in estimate or an error?” In most grant cases, HKAS 8 / IAS 8 points to a change in estimate, affecting current and future periods only.
- For both income‑related and asset‑related grants, always use up any remaining deferred income first before taking the excess repayment to expense; do not jump straight to expensing the whole repayment.
- For asset‑related grants, remember that repayments can change the carrying amount of assets, future depreciation and may trigger an impairment test; do not treat it as a pure profit‑or‑loss issue only.
- In working papers and exams, clearly separate three ideas: initial recognition, subsequent changes/repayments, and disclosure of unfulfilled conditions or contingencies. This is how the standards are structured.
- When preparing notes, do more than just say “the entity received government grants.” Explain the nature, key conditions, any unfulfilled obligations and how management assessed the risk of repayment—this is what seniors, auditors and examiners look for to see whether you truly understand HKAS 20 / IAS 20.
If you’d like to ask me questions or chat about your learning, you can follow me on Threads / IG and send me a DM — I’ll reply as far as I can.
And if you feel these resources have helped you, you can also buy me a coffee to support me in writing more.
罔相心室: https://chinese.iamdelusionman.com/
Zero-to-Acct Substack: https://zerotoacct.substack.com/
Thread: https://www.threads.com/@yickki_mong
IG: https://www.instagram.com/yickki_mong/
