Since 2025, most standard‑related articles on this site have been available in both Chinese and English versions. If you’d like to read the Chinese explanation, please visit the 「系列總覽」 page and look for the corresponding article.
I’ll gradually organise the accounting standard articles that have already been published, so that you can use this series overview to quickly see what each standard is broadly about and which related articles are available on this site.
HKAS
- Understand the role of HKAS 1 / IAS 1: it governs presentation of financial statements, not the underlying calculations or measurements.
- Know which entities must follow it, and how it links with other standards like HKAS 34 / IAS 34 and HKFRS 10 / IFRS 10.
- Grasp key concepts such as general purpose financial statements, materiality, profit or loss and other comprehensive income (OCI).
- Know what makes up a “complete set of financial statements”, including when a third statement of financial position (opening balance sheet) is required.
- Build a mental “map” of the financial statements that will help you go deeper into each individual statement later.
- Explain the relationship between “true and fair presentation” and compliance with HKFRSs / IFRSs, and describe the very rare conditions for departing from a standard and the related disclosures.
- Understand what going concern and accrual basis mean, and why significant uncertainty about going concern (for example, in restructuring or near‑bankruptcy situations) must be clearly disclosed.
- Apply the principle of “materiality and aggregation”: when to split out important items, when it is acceptable to combine smaller ones, and how to avoid burying key information.
- Explain why assets and liabilities, income and expenses generally must not be offset, and recognise common situations where net presentation is allowed or required.
- Use the updated materiality definition, including the ideas of “could reasonably be expected to influence” and “obscuring information”, to design sensible disclosure decisions in practice.
- Explain the role of the SoFP within the full set of financial statements and list the main line items HKAS 1 requires, together with the basic logic behind their classification.
- Decide when it is appropriate to add extra line items and subtotals (including management‑defined subtotals) and apply the principles of consistency and “not misleading”.
- Apply the core definitions of current assets and current liabilities, including the ideas of operating cycle, the 12‑month benchmark, and an “unconditional right to defer settlement”.
- Deal with common problem areas like debt covenant breaches, refinancing and grace periods, and identify which events at the reporting date actually change current vs non‑current classification.
- Develop an initial framework for classifying convertible instruments and other borderline liabilities, and draft a compliant SoFP structure using examples as a guide.
- Distinguish the two presentation formats for the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, understand how OCI is grouped, and remember that “extraordinary items” are not allowed labels.
- Explain the difference between analysing expenses by nature and by function, and know the extra disclosures required when the entity uses the function‑of‑expense method.
- Describe what must be shown in the statement of changes in equity, including total comprehensive income, retrospective application / restatement, and where dividend information should appear.
- Understand the structure of the notes and why cross‑referencing is so important, plus the newer focus on “material” accounting policy information instead of long boilerplate text.
- Grasp the key points for disclosing judgements, estimation uncertainty and capital management, and know how an entity should explain breaches of capital requirements to users of the financial statements.
- Explain the objective of HKAS 2 / IAS 2 and its position within the wider standard framework.
- Identify which assets qualify as inventories and understand common categories in practice.
- Distinguish items that are outside the scope of HKAS 2 and understand why they are excluded or partially exempt.
- Clearly separate net realisable value (NRV) from fair value and understand how they relate.
- Apply the “lower of cost and net realisable value” principle and avoid overstating inventory in real-life situations.
- The purchasing team thinks freight is “not material”, so they never send full information to accounting.
- Fixed manufacturing overheads such as factory depreciation and supervisors’ salaries are allocated to products using vague or inconsistent methods.
- Different staff use different cost formulas (some FIFO, some weighted average) for very similar products, just because “that’s how I’ve always done it”.
《[Concept 007]HKAS 2 / IAS 2 Net Realisable Value and Inventory Write‑downs in Plain English》
- Clearly write and calculate NRV as: expected selling price − estimated costs to complete − estimated selling costs.
- Spot typical red flags that trigger an NRV test, such as damage, obsolescence, selling price drops, or rising completion and selling costs.
- Understand why NRV testing is normally done item by item, and when it is acceptable to test by group or product line.
- Apply the rule that raw materials and supplies are usually not written down if the finished goods they go into are still profitable overall.
- Deal with firm sales contracts, consider post‑year‑end price information when estimating NRV, and record write‑downs and reversals correctly in the financial statements.
《[Concept 008]HKAS 2 / IAS 2 Inventory Costing, Expense Recognition and Disclosures in Plain English》
- Understand how inventory turns into cost of sales when it is sold, and how related costs show up in the statement of profit or loss.
- Know where inventory write-downs and reversals are presented in profit or loss, and how they affect gross profit and net profit.
- See that some inventory costs are capitalised into other assets (for example self-constructed property, plant and equipment) and then expensed later through depreciation.
- Be familiar with the main HKAS 2 / IAS 2 disclosure requirements: cost formulas, amounts expensed, write-downs and reversals, and fair-value-based inventory, so you can read typical note disclosures in annual reports.
- Spot common practical and exam mistakes, such as mixing cost formulas, capitalising abnormal wastage, or confusing NRV with fair value.
- Clearly explain the objective of HKAS 7 / IAS 7 and which entities must prepare a statement of cash flows.
- Distinguish correctly between “cash” and “cash equivalents” and avoid common misunderstandings.
- Understand why certain cash management activities (like moving money between current and time deposits) are not treated as cash flows.
- Grasp the logic behind the three categories: operating, investing and financing activities.
- Appreciate how the cash flow statement adds value in financial analysis and day‑to‑day practice.
- Explain in your own words what operating cash flows are, and how they relate to items in the statement of profit or loss.
- Clearly identify what belongs in investing activities, especially applying the key rule that only expenditure leading to the recognition of an asset can be treated as investing cash flows, so you avoid putting branding, advertising or training spend there.
- Understand the scope of financing activities, including changes in share capital and borrowings, cash flows for dividends and the principal portion of finance lease payments, and why the 2016 disclosure reform emphasised the “bridge-style” reconciliation for changes in financing liabilities.
- Deal with borderline cases (complex financial instruments, bank overdrafts, restricted cash, expenditure that does not become an asset) using substance-over-form and consistency principles.
- Understand the overall structure of a cash flow statement: the three activity categories, the foreign exchange adjustment line, and how opening and closing cash and cash equivalents are linked.
- Apply the indirect method starting from profit, adjusting for non‑cash items, investing and financing‑related gains and losses, and changes in working capital.
- Identify which transactions can be reported on a net basis and understand how net presentation affects analysis and its limitations.
- Translate foreign currency cash flows, decide when approximate rates are acceptable, and explain why the effect of exchange rate changes is shown as a separate line rather than within the three activities.
- Operating cash flows may look strong simply because large interest payments are pushed into financing activities, misleading management and investors about the true underlying performance.
- The entity may obtain assets via finance leases but fail to disclose these as non‑cash investing and financing transactions, making the sources of debt growth less transparent.
- The reconciliation of changes in liabilities from financing activities may be incomplete, so users cannot see clearly how borrowings changed due to cash flows, foreign exchange, fair value movements, acquisitions or disposals of subsidiaries.
- Understand the core purpose of HKAS 8 / IAS 8 and where it sits in the broader framework of accounting standards.
- Clearly distinguish between accounting policies, accounting estimates, and prior period errors — and know how each is treated.
- Recognise which situations fall under HKAS 8 and which are governed by other standards.
- Apply the underlying logic of all three concepts using practical, workplace-style examples.
- Have a working awareness of how HKAS 8 has evolved over time, and why certain debates still exist.
- Understand how to select an appropriate accounting policy, whether or not a specific HKFRS standard addresses the transaction in question.
- Explain why consistency is a core requirement — and understand when different policies can legitimately apply to different categories of items.
- Distinguish a genuine accounting policy change from situations that are simply new transactions, new circumstances, or updates to estimates.
- Describe the general requirement for retrospective application when a policy changes, and understand when the impracticability exception kicks in.
- Know what disclosures are required — for first-time application of a new HKFRS, and for voluntary policy changes.
- Explain what accounting estimates and measurement uncertainty are, and understand how estimates relate to — but are distinct from — accounting policies.
- Recognise the most common estimate-heavy items in practice, including ECL provisions, depreciation, net realisable value, fair value measurements, and warranty provisions.
- Distinguish a change in accounting estimate from a policy change or an error, using a clear and practical decision rule.
- Apply the prospective application requirement: understand which period or periods an estimate change affects, and how to reflect that correctly.
- Know what the notes need to say — including how to handle situations where the future impact of an estimate change simply cannot be quantified with reasonable confidence.
- Explain what a prior period error is under HKAS 8 / IAS 8, and recognise the most common types in practice.
- Understand why retrospective restatement is required for material errors — and why absorbing the cumulative impact into the current year’s profit or loss is not acceptable.
- Apply the impracticability exception correctly: know what “impracticable” genuinely means, and what to do when full retrospective restatement is not feasible.
- Know what the notes need to disclose when a prior period error is corrected, including the impact on individual line items, earnings per share and opening equity.
- Distinguish prior period errors from estimate changes and policy changes — a classification that drives the entire accounting treatment and is frequently tested in professional exams.
《[Concept 013]HKAS 10 / IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period in Plain English》
- Build a clear mental framework for HKAS 10: understand its objective, scope and key judgment mindset.
- Understand the time line of events after the reporting period and the critical dates involved.
- Distinguish between the two big categories of events: adjusting events and non‑adjusting events.
- See how HKAS 10 connects with other standards such as HKAS 1, HKAS 37 and HKFRS 3.
- Make quick, structured decisions about how to handle post‑year‑end events in practice, and avoid common mistakes.
《[Concept 014]HKAS 10 / IAS 10 Adjusting vs Non‑adjusting Events in Plain English》
- Apply a simple two‑step framework to distinguish adjusting events from non‑adjusting events, using the key question “Did the underlying condition exist at the reporting date?”.
- Recognise common adjusting event types such as lawsuit settlements, customer bankruptcies, inventory net realisable value (NRV) issues, bonuses and profit‑sharing, and the discovery of errors or fraud, and know how they typically affect key line items.
- Recognise common non‑adjusting event types such as business combinations, major fires, big movements in share prices or exchange rates, major tax law changes and new lawsuits, and know when disclosure is needed without adjusting amounts.
- Deal more confidently with “grey‑area” scenarios by asking structured questions instead of just memorizing examples.
- Use a few quick memory aids and self‑check questions that help you respond under exam pressure or in real‑life working papers.
《[Concept 015]HKAS 10 / IAS 10 in Plain English: Going Concern, Dividends and Disclosure Traps》
- Explain how HKAS 10 links with the going concern assumption, and when post‑year‑end events can “break” an existing going concern assessment.
- Identify common triggers such as big losses, failed loan renewals and loss of major customers, and distinguish which cases only need non‑adjusting disclosure and which may require a change of basis of preparation.
- Understand why dividends declared after the reporting period are not recognised as liabilities at year‑end, and how HKAS 10, HKAS 37 Provisions (equivalent to IAS 37) and HKAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (equivalent to IAS 1) work together on this point.
- Apply the disclosure principles for major non‑adjusting events: describing the nature of the event, estimating the financial impact, and explaining when estimates are not yet possible, using examples such as factory fires and business combinations.
- Break down a combined scenario and decide systematically: what to adjust, what to disclose, whether going concern is affected, and how to handle dividends.
- Explain how HKAS 10 and HKAS 37 work together for lawsuits, guarantees and other contingent liabilities: when to adjust provisions and when to just update contingent‑liability disclosures.
- Understand HKAS 1’s requirements on going concern and events after the reporting period, and how note structure can reflect your HKAS 10 judgments (for example, major non‑adjusting events and dividends declared after year‑end).
- See how HKFRS 3 and HKFRS 5 fit into post‑year‑end business combinations and held‑for‑sale situations: which parts are governed by HKAS 10 and which are driven by those other standards.
- Grasp how tax law changes and fair value information sit within the HKAS 10 framework, including when they affect amounts under HKAS 12, HKFRS 9 and HKFRS 13 and when they only affect disclosure.
- Use a simple “multi‑standard” answering strategy for exam and practical composite questions, so you can break issues into parts, avoid duplication and avoid missing disclosures.
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》
- Understand where HKAS 16 sits in the standard framework and why PPE matters so much in the financial statements.
- Distinguish which items belong in PPE versus inventories or other categories like investment property.
- Apply the two key conditions for recognising PPE in the statement of financial position.
- Judge how to classify spare parts, safety assets and other “borderline” expenditures.
- Use a simple thought process to separate day-to-day maintenance costs from capitalisable subsequent expenditure.
《[Concept 018]HKAS 16 / IAS 16 Cost Measurement in Plain English: What Really Goes Into PPE》
- Explain the three main components of the initial cost of PPE, with common examples of capitalisable costs.
- Understand why decommissioning, removal and restoration obligations are capitalised, and how they link to other standards.
- Spot several types of expenditure that look “related” to the new facility but must not be capitalised, such as start-up costs, advertising and initial operating losses.
- Explain why revenue and related costs during the testing phase go through profit or loss, instead of reducing the cost of PPE.
- Apply all of the above in a combined scenario with multiple costs and incidental income, deciding line by line what should go into PPE and what should stay in profit or loss.
- Distinguish clearly between the cost model and the revaluation model, and know when each is more appropriate.
- Explain how revaluation increases and decreases are split between OCI and profit or loss, and how revaluation affects the future depreciation base.
- Understand the core principles of depreciation, including when it starts and stops, and why assets are depreciated even when idle.
- Use the component depreciation idea for assets like aircraft (body vs engines), and explain why revenue‑based depreciation is usually not acceptable.
- See how changes in useful life, residual value or depreciation method are treated as changes in estimates (not policies), and how all this links to impairment testing under HKAS 36.
- State clearly when PPE should be derecognised and explain how the “date of disposal” is linked to transfer of control.
- Calculate disposal gains and losses, explain why they cannot be classified as revenue, and distinguish them from ordinary revenue under HKFRS 15.
- Describe what bearer plants are, how they are accounted for under HKAS 16 (cost model / revaluation model), and how this differs from the old HKAS 41 fair value approach.
- Summarise the main arguments for and against moving bearer plants into HKAS 16, and understand the trade‑off between information and volatility.
- Explain why testing‑phase revenue and related costs must go through profit or loss instead of reducing PPE cost, and how this improves faithful representation and comparability.
《》
《》
- Explain the core objective and basic principles of HKAS 19, and where it sits relative to other standards like HKFRS 2 Share‑based Payment and HKAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans.
- Clearly distinguish the four types of employee benefits: short‑term, post‑employment, other long‑term and termination benefits, and understand that the key is expected settlement timing and nature of the benefit, not just the label.
- Identify common examples of short‑term employee benefits (salaries, annual leave, sick leave, short‑term bonuses) and understand the usual accounting treatment, including undiscounted accruals and expense recognition.
- Grasp the basic idea of other long‑term employee benefits and termination benefits: when they arise, when they are recognised, and why they often involve discounting, estimation and more professional judgement.
- Place all of these into the overall structure of HKAS 19, so you know how to progress next into detailed measurement of defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB) post‑employment plans.
- Describe the scope of post‑employment benefits, including pensions, lump‑sum retirement payments and post‑retirement medical coverage, and explain why HKAS 19 / IAS 19 emphasises economic substance when distinguishing DC from DB.
- Decide whether a particular post‑employment arrangement is a defined contribution plan by checking whether the employer’s obligation is limited to agreed contributions and whether actuarial and investment risks sit with the employee.
- Apply the basic accounting treatment for defined contribution plans: when to recognise expenses and liabilities, when contributions can be capitalised, why discounting is needed if settlement is more than 12 months after service, and how to think about the entries.
- Understand the 2013 practical expedient for employee contributions: in what circumstances employees’ contributions can be treated as a straightforward reduction of current service cost, without complex attribution over service lives.
- Appreciate why some multi‑employer plans must be accounted for as if they were DC plans when information is insufficient, and what that means for users trying to understand the company’s real risk exposure, setting the stage for deeper DB study later.
- Explain why HKAS 19 / IAS 19 requires defined benefit obligations to be measured using the projected unit credit method, instead of dumping all pension cost into one late year.
- Follow a simplified DB plan example (for example, final salary × percentage × years of service) and see how current service cost and the present value of the defined benefit obligation are built up over time.
- Understand how benefits are attributed to periods of service under the PUC method, and why certain “back‑loaded” benefit designs (such as post‑employment medical schemes) require earlier straight‑line attribution.
- Describe key actuarial assumptions, including demographic assumptions (mortality, staff turnover, retirement age) and financial assumptions (salary growth, medical cost inflation, discount rates), and the requirements that they be unbiased, mutually consistent and based on market expectations at the reporting date.
- Explain why the discount rate is based on high‑quality corporate bonds (or government bonds if there is no deep corporate bond market) and why it reflects only the time value of money, not actuarial or investment risk.
- State that the net defined benefit liability (asset) equals the present value of the defined benefit obligation minus the fair value of plan assets, and identify the three main components of defined benefit cost: service cost, net interest and remeasurements.
- Explain that service cost includes current service cost, past service cost and settlement gains or losses, and that past service cost must now be recognised immediately in profit or loss when a plan amendment or curtailment becomes effective.
- Describe the logic of net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset): why the same discount rate is applied to both the obligation and the plan assets, and how the net amount reflects the unwinding of the discount on the net liability.
- Identify what goes into remeasurements in OCI (actuarial gains and losses, returns on plan assets excluding interest income, and changes in the effect of the asset ceiling), and remember that these items are recognised in OCI and never recycled to profit or loss.
- Distinguish termination benefits from normal post‑employment or other long‑term benefits, and determine when termination benefits must be recognised under HKAS 19.
《[Concept 029]HKAS 19 / IAS 19 in Plain English: How It Connects to HKFRS 2, HKAS 37 and US GAAP》
- Separate employee rewards into HKAS 19 employee benefits (cash / non‑share benefits) and HKFRS 2 share‑based payment (equity or equity‑linked), and understand how cost is spread over the service period under each.
- Tell termination benefits under HKAS 19 apart from restructuring provisions under HKAS 37, and coordinate their recognition timing using the “earlier of” rule.
- Explain that HKAS 19 / IFRS require defined benefit remeasurements to stay in OCI with no recycling, whereas US GAAP allows some reclassifications to profit or loss, and understand how that affects earnings analysis.
- Use typical HKAS 19 examples (accumulating sick leave, bonus plans, benefit attribution and termination benefits) to identify the judgement points examiners like to test.
- Apply a simple framework in practice to handle DC vs DB classification, discount rate selection, and the split between profit or loss and OCI.
《[Concept 030]HKAS 20 / IAS 20 Government Grants in Plain English: Scope, Logic and Common Pitfalls》
- Decide whether a particular government support scheme falls within the scope of HKAS 20 / IAS 20.
- Distinguish clearly between “government grants” and broader “government assistance” and explain the logic behind that distinction.
- Explain when a grant should be recognised and how it should be matched to related costs or assets over time.
- Describe at a high level how HKAS 20 interacts with other standards such as HKFRS 9 / IFRS 9 and HKAS 8 / IAS 8.
- Avoid several common real-life mistakes and exam traps around timing, classification and disclosure.
- Judge when a government grant has reached “reasonable assurance” and can be recognised as income.
- Distinguish between “immediate compensation” and “future cost compensation” and apply different recognition patterns.
- Apply the income approach instead of an unacceptable cash basis when dealing with government grants.
- Compare the deferred income approach and the deduction from asset approach for asset‑related grants, and understand their impact on the financial statements.
- Choose and explain appropriate presentation methods for income‑related grants, including typical journal entries.
- Compare the old and revised treatment of below‑market‑rate government loans and explain the rationale for the change.
- Apply HKFRS 9 / IFRS 9 to measure a government loan at fair value and identify the embedded grant represented by the interest discount.
- Explain how and when forgivable loans are treated as government grants under HKAS 20 / IAS 20.
- Distinguish government assistance from government grants, and understand what needs recognition versus what only needs disclosure.
- Understand the prospective application of the low‑interest loan amendments and the practical impact on existing loans and disclosures.
- Explain why grant repayments are usually treated as changes in accounting estimates, not corrections of errors, under HKAS 8 / IAS 8.
- Handle the journal‑entry logic when income‑related grants are repaid or when conditions change.
- Understand how the repayment of asset‑related grants affects the carrying amount of assets, depreciation and potential impairment testing.
- Build a disclosure framework that follows the spirit of HKAS 20 / IAS 20 and HKAS 8 / IAS 8 for both grants and wider government assistance.
- Avoid common pitfalls such as wrongly treating repayments as prior‑period errors or ignoring unfulfilled conditions in the notes.
- Understand the objective and scope of HKAS / IAS 21, and where it stops because other standards (especially HKFRS / IFRS 9) take over.
- Distinguish clearly between three currency roles: functional currency, presentation currency and foreign currency, and see how they relate to each other.
- Apply the main and secondary indicators to decide a company’s functional currency in a structured way.
- Grasp the logic behind deciding the functional currency of a foreign operation (subsidiary / branch) within a group.
- Understand when a change in functional currency is allowed and how it is accounted for.
- Avoid common mistakes, such as treating the presentation currency as if it must always be the functional currency.
- Understand which exchange rate to use when initially recognising foreign currency transactions, and when practical approximations like average rates are acceptable.
- Distinguish between monetary and non‑monetary items, and know which ones generate exchange differences when rates move.
- Apply a three‑rule framework for translating foreign currency items at the reporting date.
- See clearly when exchange differences go to profit or loss, and when they go to other comprehensive income (OCI).
- Understand how impairment testing interacts with exchange rates and functional currency.
- Appreciate why “capitalising” exchange differences into asset cost used to be allowed and is now largely prohibited.
- Walk through a full worked example, from transaction date to collection and year‑end retranslation, and tie the numbers back to the principles.
- Understand a four‑step path for exchange differences arising from foreign operations.
- Apply the three basic steps for translating a foreign operation’s financial statements into the group’s presentation currency.
- Explain why translation differences usually accumulate in OCI rather than going straight into profit or loss.
- Distinguish what counts as a net investment in a foreign operation, and how related long‑term loans are treated in separate and consolidated financial statements.
- Understand how accumulated exchange differences are reclassified to profit or loss when a foreign operation is disposed of or control / significant influence is lost.
- Avoid common consolidation mistakes such as incorrectly clearing FX reserves into retained earnings, or wrongly eliminating intra‑group FX differences.
- Explain why, in a hyperinflationary economy, financial statements must first be restated under HKAS 29, and only then translated under HKAS 21 using the closing rate.
- Understand what “lack of exchangeability” means, and how HKAS 21 requires estimated rates and specific disclosures when a currency cannot practically be exchanged.
- See why goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets of that foreign operation, translated at the closing rate with FX differences in OCI.
- Link HKAS 21 with HKFRS 9 hedge accounting and see why some FX differences that would normally go to profit or loss are redirected to OCI.
- Appreciate how HKFRS 10 (consolidation) and HKAS 36 (impairment) interact with FX: intra‑group monetary balances, FX differences and how to treat currency in impairment tests.
- Recognise common practical controversies and traps and start to build a more integrated “cross‑standard map” around HKAS 21.
《[Concept 038]HKAS 23 / IAS 23 Borrowing Costs in Plain English: From Expense or Capitalise?》
- Understand the purpose and basic principles of HKAS 23 / IAS 23.
- Identify which items qualify as “borrowing costs” under the standard.
- Explain what a “qualifying asset” is and apply the key tests.
- Recognise common items that are scoped out of HKAS 23.
- Grasp the idea of “directly attributable” borrowing costs and why it is a judgment area.
- Explain why HKAS 23 / IAS 23 no longer allows a free choice between capitalising and expensing borrowing costs.
- Calculate the amount of borrowing costs to capitalise for specific borrowings, including how to adjust for temporary investment income.
- Compute a capitalisation rate for general borrowings, and apply the rule that capitalised interest cannot exceed actual borrowing costs for the period.
- Understand how specific borrowings are treated once the qualifying asset is complete, and how they join the general borrowing pool.
- Apply the three conditions for starting capitalisation, and judge when to suspend or stop capitalising in common delay or phased‑completion scenarios.
- Develop a sharper understanding of what “directly attributable” really means in HKAS 23 / IAS 23, beyond “if there is borrowing, then capitalise”.
- Understand the thinking behind allocating borrowing costs where there is centralised group funding and multiple debt instruments, instead of treating formulas as black boxes.
- Distinguish, especially for land, which activities are genuine “capitalisation activities” and which are just passive holding or waiting.
- See how HKAS 23 links with HKFRS 9 and HKFRS 16, and why you cannot read HKAS 23 in isolation.
- Recognise common mistakes and exam traps, and know which areas deserve extra attention in working papers or revision.
- Understand the purpose of HKAS 24 / IAS 24 and how it supports transparency for users of financial statements.
- Clearly identify the scope of the standard and which types of financial statements it applies to.
- Distinguish “normal” related party relationships from those that may create bias, conflicts of interest or additional risk.
- See how HKAS 24 / IAS 24 connects with other key standards such as HKFRS 10 / IFRS 10, HKFRS 12 / IFRS 12 and HKAS 19 / IAS 19.
- Build a basic understanding of the major revisions to HKAS 24 and the typical areas of debate in practice.
《[Concept 042]HKAS 24 / IAS 24 Related Parties in Plain English: Who Counts and How to Spot Them》
- Build an overall “map” of who counts as a related party under HKAS 24 / IAS 24, and understand the spirit behind the definition.
- Distinguish how parents, subsidiaries, fellow subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures become related parties to each other.
- Understand how individuals become related parties: through control, joint control, significant influence and close members of the family.
- Grasp the logic around key management personnel and management entities, and what that means for disclosures.
- Recognise the main relationships that the standard explicitly excludes, so you know when something that “feels related” is actually not a related party.
- Apply a simple step-by-step model to convert the text of the standard into a clear “yes/no” related party conclusion in practice.
- Clearly list what parent entities, subsidiaries and the ultimate controlling party must disclose, even when there are no transactions with each other during the period.
- Apply the four basic disclosure elements for related party transactions: nature and relationship, amounts, closing balances and terms/guarantees, plus any bad debt information.
- Recognise the most common related party transaction types and commitments, and understand why “executory contracts” (commitments) still matter to users.
- Decide when aggregation is acceptable and when you need to break items out and explain them one by one.
- Understand the five standard categories of KMP compensation, and why under a management entity model you do not have to split individual KMP pay.
- Develop a cautious, defensible approach to “arm’s length” statements in the notes, so you only use them when you have solid support.
- Walk through a simple “flowchart mindset” for HKAS 24 / IAS 24: from identifying related parties to deciding disclosure depth.
- Handle complex ownership and multi‑person control structures systematically, and clearly label which related party category each party falls into.
- Separate HKAS 24 disclosure issues from HKAS 20 government grant issues when government-related entities and subsidies appear in the same case.
- Avoid several very common misjudgements that show up again and again in practice and exams.
- Use a concise “quick‑memory” framework to tackle HKAS 24 / IAS 24 questions without word‑for‑word memorisation.
- Clearly define the scope of HKAS 26 and identify which retirement benefit arrangements fall under this standard, and which do not.
- Explain why a retirement benefit plan is treated as a separate reporting entity, instead of just being a note in the employer’s financial statements.
- Distinguish between HKAS 19 (employer’s perspective) and HKAS 26 (plan’s perspective) when analysing the same retirement arrangement.
- Understand the basic definitions and reporting objectives for defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.
- Grasp the idea of “net assets available for benefits”, the core content of a retirement benefit plan’s financial statements and disclosures, and how these concepts link to familiar Hong Kong arrangements such as MPF and ORSO plans.
- Clearly state the reporting objective of HKAS 26 for defined benefit plans: not just showing net assets, but also the actuarial present value of promised benefits and the relationship between the two.
- Distinguish between actuarial present values based on current salary and projected salary, and explain the assumptions, uses and limitations of each.
- Understand the logic of dual disclosure – why providing both present values can help users see both the “if we stop now” and the “if we carry on as planned” views of the obligation.
- Explain HKAS 26’s requirement to measure plan assets at fair value, and the special treatment allowed for certain fixed‑return investments held specifically to match known obligations.
- Read the main disclosures in a defined benefit plan financial report: statement of changes in net assets, asset breakdown and valuation bases, major individual investments, exposure to the sponsoring employer, and funding policy / sufficiency explanations.
《[Concept 048]HKAS 26 / IAS 26 in Plain English: MPF, ORSO and Insurance‑Backed Plans in Hong Kong》
- Clearly explain that MPF schemes are always defined contribution plans, while ORSO schemes may be either defined contribution or defined benefit, and understand how HKAS 26 Appendix A connects to local legal reporting requirements.
- Sketch the main structure of MPF / ORSO scheme financial statements (for example, statement of assets and liabilities, statements of movements in capital or member equity, investment reports) and recall the six‑month regulatory filing deadline.
- Distinguish between directly invested plans, insured plans and fully insured plans, and understand why, in a fully insured scenario with no further plan obligation, insurance policies can effectively “disappear” from the plan’s statement of assets and liabilities.
- Grasp the basic accounting logic for additional voluntary contributions (AVCs) and forfeited benefits, and why they often need separate disclosure.
- Understand the role of actuarial reports, contribution rates and funding adequacy disclosures in the MPF / ORSO regulatory framework, and recognise that HKAS 26 and IAS 26 share the same core text, with Appendix A adding a Hong Kong‑specific layer that is highly relevant for exams and practice.
- Explain in simple terms the historical background of HKAS 27 and its current role in dealing only with separate financial statements
- Distinguish between consolidated financial statements and separate financial statements, and know when a set of financial statements does not count as separate even though it’s not consolidated
- Understand the core principle of HKAS 27: how to choose and consistently apply accounting policies for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in separate statements, and why this design matters
- Recognise the scope of HKAS 27: it doesn’t force you to prepare separate financial statements, but once you choose or are required to prepare them, you must follow HKAS 27 for those investments
- Roughly understand how HKAS 27 relates to HKFRS 10, HKFRS 11, HKAS 28, HKFRS 9, HKFRS 5 and HKFRS 12, laying the foundation for deeper study of each topic
- Summarise in simple terms the three major investment measurement methods allowed by HKAS 27: cost method, measurement in accordance with HKFRS 9, and using the equity method, plus the “one method per category” requirement
- Explain the basic operating logic of the cost method in separate financial statements, including initial recognition, no subsequent revaluation, and the perspective difference from consolidated statements
- Describe how to handle fair value changes in separate statements when investments are measured under HKFRS 9, and why classification as held for sale still maintains the HKFRS 9 measurement basis rather than switching to the HKFRS 5 model
- Understand how the equity method returned as a policy option in separate statements after the 2014 amendments, and the treatment logic for investment carrying amounts and dividends when using the equity method
- Grasp several key exceptions: the intersection with HKFRS 5 when investments are classified as held for sale, when dividend income should be recognised and how it signals impairment, and the special provision for measuring cost when a new parent company is established through reorganisation using the original parent’s equity carrying amount
- Explain in simple terms what an “investment entity” is, and why such entities measure certain subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in both consolidated and separate financial statements, rather than consolidating or using the cost method
- Know what key disclosures are required in separate financial statements when a parent company uses HKFRS 10’s exemption and doesn’t prepare consolidated statements, so users know “where to find the complete group statements”
- Understand why, when using the equity method in separate statements, goodwill impairment is usually assessed at the whole investment level, when to stop recognising losses once they exceed the investment carrying amount, and how to avoid unreasonable discrepancies with consolidated statement impairment conclusions
- Recognise that certain arrangements between HKAS 27 and other standards (such as HKAS 23, HKFRS 9) naturally produce different results in consolidated versus separate statements, and the key is to clearly distinguish statement levels and enhance disclosure rather than forcing “alignment”
- Remember that when a new parent company is established under common control reorganisation, under the cost method the new parent typically uses the original parent’s equity carrying amount as investment cost, rather than the fair value of shares issued, avoiding unnecessary gains/losses or revaluation differences from “shell changes”
- Distinguish between an associate and a joint venture — and explain why the difference matters.
- Know when HKAS 28 applies, and when HKFRS 10 or HKFRS 9 takes over instead.
- Understand the logic of the equity method — specifically, why it tracks the investor’s share of net assets rather than just dividend receipts.
- Map out how HKAS 28 interacts with other key standards.
- Lay the groundwork for more advanced topics such as long-term interests and cessation of the equity method.
- Explain the formal definition of significant influence and how the 20% presumption works.
- Use qualitative evidence (board participation, major transactions, technical dependence, etc.) to assess influence in real‑life scenarios.
- Understand how potential voting rights (options, convertibles) affect the significant‑influence judgement when they are currently exercisable.
- Apply the equity method: from initial recognition at cost through to basic subsequent measurement.
- Perform a simple year‑one carrying amount calculation for an equity‑accounted investment.
- What counts as long‑term interests that form part of the net investment.
- How HKFRS 9 / IFRS 9 and HKAS 28 / IAS 28 interact and in which order.
- How to allocate losses when they exceed the equity carrying amount.
- When to stop recognising further losses.
- How to perform impairment on the overall net investment
- Exemptions from applying the equity method.
- The fair value through profit or loss (FVPL) option.
- Reliefs for investment entities.
- Losing significant influence or joint control and stopping the equity method.
- Reclassification to held for sale, OCI recycling, and changes between associates and joint ventures.
- Tell the difference between control, significant influence and joint control, and know which standard to use in each case (HKFRS 10 / HKAS 28 / HKFRS 11 / HKFRS 9).
- Apply the basic steps when you lose significant influence or joint control under HKAS 28: when to stop the equity method and how to deal with remeasurement and reclassification.
- Explain what happens when you lose control of a subsidiary under HKFRS 10: deconsolidation, fair value for any retained interest and OCI recycling.
- See the main similarities and differences between these two situations, especially around retained interests, fair value measurement and profit or loss.
- Follow a simple “subsidiary → associate → financial asset” storyline to link the whole investment life cycle, and use it to avoid mixing up HKFRS 10 events with HKAS 28 events in exams or working papers
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》
To Be Continued…
HKFRS
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》
《》